Skip to content

fix ci reusable workflow to checkout the correct rmg-py#2510

Closed
JacksonBurns wants to merge 7 commits intoReactionMechanismGenerator:mainfrom
JacksonBurns:resuable-workflow-fix
Closed

fix ci reusable workflow to checkout the correct rmg-py#2510
JacksonBurns wants to merge 7 commits intoReactionMechanismGenerator:mainfrom
JacksonBurns:resuable-workflow-fix

Conversation

@JacksonBurns
Copy link
Contributor

@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns commented Jul 28, 2023

See #2504 (comment) and nearby comments - fixes an issue with the CI not correctly checking out RMG-Py from forks.

@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns added the Status: Ready for Review PR is complete and ready to be reviewed label Jul 28, 2023
@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns requested a review from rwest July 28, 2023 23:49
rwest
rwest approved these changes Jul 29, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@rwest rwest left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks right to me - if it works for you!

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 29, 2023

Regression Testing Results

⚠️ One or more regression tests failed.
Please download the failed results and run the tests locally or check the log to see why.

Detailed regression test results.

Regression test aromatics:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:32
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:21
Reference: Memory used: 2095.80 MB
Current: Memory used: 2101.76 MB

aromatics Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 15 species.
Test model has 15 species. ✅
Original model has 11 reactions.
Test model has 11 reactions. ✅

aromatics Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 106 species.
Test model has 106 species. ✅
Original model has 358 reactions.
Test model has 358 reactions. ✅

Non-identical thermo! ❌
original: C=CC1C=CC2=CC1C=C2
tested: C=CC1C=CC2=CC1C=C2

Hf(300K) S(300K) Cp(300K) Cp(400K) Cp(500K) Cp(600K) Cp(800K) Cp(1000K) Cp(1500K)
83.22 82.78 35.48 45.14 53.78 61.40 73.58 82.20 95.08
83.22 84.16 35.48 45.14 53.78 61.40 73.58 82.20 95.08

Identical thermo comments:
thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)CsH) + group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)CsH) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)) + group(Cds- CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)H) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)H) + group(Cds-CdsHH) + Estimated bicyclic component: polycyclic(s3_5_6_ane) - ring(Cyclohexane) - ring(Cyclopentane) + ring(1,3-Cyclohexadiene) + ring(Cyclopentadiene)

Non-identical thermo! ❌
original: C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2
tested: C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2

Hf(300K) S(300K) Cp(300K) Cp(400K) Cp(500K) Cp(600K) Cp(800K) Cp(1000K) Cp(1500K)
129.39 79.85 22.98 30.09 36.61 42.21 50.22 55.39 65.95
164.90 80.93 22.21 28.97 35.25 40.69 48.70 53.97 64.36

thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)H) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)H) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)H) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cdd-CdsCds) + Estimated bicyclic component: polycyclic(s4_6_6_ane) - ring(Cyclohexane) - ring(Cyclohexane) + ring(124cyclohexatriene) + ring(1,4-Cyclohexadiene)
thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)H) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)H) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)H) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cdd-CdsCds) + Estimated bicyclic component: polycyclic(s4_6_6_ane) - ring(Cyclohexane) - ring(Cyclohexane) + ring(124cyclohexatriene) + ring(124cyclohexatriene)

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: [c]1ccccc1(3) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> benzene(1) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: [c]1ccccc1(3) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> benzene(1) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): 4.24 4.69 5.05 5.33 5.79 6.14 6.78 7.23
k(T): -3.00 -0.74 0.70 1.71 3.07 3.97 5.33 6.15

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(0,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(9.943,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 38.5 to 41.6 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 38.5 to 41.6 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: [H](4) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> [H][H](11) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: [H](4) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> [H][H](11) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): 5.77 5.83 5.88 5.92 5.97 6.02 6.10 6.16
k(T): -7.44 -4.08 -2.05 -0.69 1.02 2.06 3.46 4.18

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(4.06926e+10,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0.47, Ea=(0,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(4.06926e+10,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0.47, Ea=(18.137,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 75.2 to 75.9 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 75.2 to 75.9 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: [CH]=C(7) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C=C(13) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: [CH]=C(7) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C=C(13) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): 4.06 4.76 5.18 5.46 5.81 6.02 6.30 6.44
k(T): -7.17 -3.66 -1.56 -0.16 1.60 2.65 4.05 4.75

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(7.23e+12,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(3.841,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_N-Sp-6R!H-4CHNS Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(7.23e+12,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(19.262,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_N-Sp-6R!H-4CHNS Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
Identical kinetics comments:
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_N-Sp-6R!H-4CHNS
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: [CH]1C2=CC=CC12(8) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2CC2=C1(27) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: [CH]1C2=CC=CC12(8) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2CC2=C1(27) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -4.55 -1.90 -0.23 0.94 2.49 3.50 5.02 5.92
k(T): -30.48 -21.35 -15.79 -12.03 -7.23 -4.28 -0.16 2.03

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(12.063,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 46.8 to 50.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(47.659,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 195.4 to 199.4 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 46.8 to 50.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 195.4 to 199.4 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: [CH]1C2=CC=CC12(8) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2C=C2C1(29) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: [CH]1C2=CC=CC12(8) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2C=C2C1(29) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -5.30 -2.46 -0.68 0.57 2.21 3.28 4.87 5.80
k(T): -31.23 -21.91 -16.23 -12.40 -7.51 -4.50 -0.31 1.91

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(13.089,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 53.5 to 54.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(48.686,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 202.2 to 203.7 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 53.5 to 54.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 202.2 to 203.7 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: [CH]1C2=CC=CC12(8) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2=CC2C1(28) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: [CH]1C2=CC=CC12(8) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2=CC2C1(28) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -1.38 0.48 1.67 2.52 3.68 4.45 5.66 6.39
k(T): -27.24 -18.91 -13.84 -10.40 -6.02 -3.30 0.48 2.51

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(7.718,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(43.208,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 180.2 to 180.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 180.2 to 180.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: [CH]=CC=C(15) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C=CC=C(17) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: [CH]=CC=C(15) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C=CC=C(17) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -0.49 0.99 1.87 2.46 3.19 3.64 4.23 4.52
k(T): -11.95 -7.61 -5.01 -3.27 -1.10 0.20 1.93 2.80

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(2.529e+11,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(8.084,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-6R!H-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(2.529e+11,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(23.821,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-6R!H-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
Identical kinetics comments:
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-6R!H-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]=Cc1ccccc1(12) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C=Cc1ccccc1(16) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]=Cc1ccccc1(12) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C=Cc1ccccc1(16) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -0.66 0.85 1.76 2.37 3.13 3.58 4.19 4.49
k(T): -12.28 -7.86 -5.21 -3.44 -1.23 0.10 1.87 2.75

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(2.529e+11,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(8.328,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-6R!H-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(2.529e+11,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(24.273,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-6R!H-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
Identical kinetics comments:
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-6R!H-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]1C2=CC=CC1C=C2(48) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC(=C1)C2(69) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]1C2=CC=CC1C=C2(48) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC(=C1)C2(69) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -4.51 -1.87 -0.20 0.96 2.51 3.52 5.03 5.92
k(T): -30.44 -21.32 -15.76 -12.01 -7.22 -4.26 -0.16 2.03

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(12.01,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 46.5 to 50.2 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(47.606,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 195.1 to 199.2 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 46.5 to 50.2 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 195.1 to 199.2 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]1C2=CC=CC1C=C2(48) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC(=C2)C1(70) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]1C2=CC=CC1C=C2(48) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC(=C2)C1(70) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -6.18 -3.12 -1.20 0.13 1.88 3.01 4.70 5.67
k(T): -32.11 -22.57 -16.76 -12.84 -7.84 -4.76 -0.49 1.78

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(14.299,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 56.6 to 59.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(49.895,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 205.2 to 208.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 56.6 to 59.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 205.2 to 208.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]1C2=CC=CC1C=C2(48) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2=CC(C=C2)C1(71) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]1C2=CC=CC1C=C2(48) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2=CC(C=C2)C1(71) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -8.04 -4.52 -2.32 -0.81 1.18 2.46 4.32 5.39
k(T): -33.97 -23.97 -17.88 -13.77 -8.54 -5.32 -0.86 1.50

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(16.86,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 65.8 to 70.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(52.457,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 214.4 to 219.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 65.8 to 70.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 214.4 to 219.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC1C=C2(82) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC1C=C2(82) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -4.55 -1.90 -0.23 0.94 2.49 3.50 5.02 5.92
k(T): -30.48 -21.35 -15.79 -12.03 -7.23 -4.28 -0.16 2.03

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(12.063,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 46.8 to 50.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(47.659,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 195.4 to 199.4 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 46.8 to 50.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 195.4 to 199.4 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC1=CC2(83) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC1=CC2(83) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): 3.96 4.60 5.07 5.43 5.98 6.39 7.11 7.60
k(T): -19.49 -12.98 -9.00 -6.29 -2.81 -0.64 2.42 4.08

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(51.5097,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(1.036,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 9.0""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(51.5097,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(33.226,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 9.0 Ea raised from 133.4 to 139.0 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 9.0
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 9.0
Ea raised from 133.4 to 139.0 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Details Observables Test Case: Aromatics Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.500 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

aromatics Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test liquid_oxidation:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:03:10
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:44
Reference: Memory used: 2219.63 MB
Current: Memory used: 2226.39 MB

liquid_oxidation Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 37 species.
Test model has 37 species. ✅
Original model has 215 reactions.
Test model has 215 reactions. ✅

liquid_oxidation Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 202 species.
Test model has 202 species. ✅
Original model has 1610 reactions.
Test model has 1610 reactions. ✅

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: CCCCCO[O](104) + CC(CC(C)OO)O[O](103) <=> oxygen(1) + CCCCC[O](128) + CC([O])CC(C)OO(127) origin: Peroxyl_Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: CCCCCO[O](103) + CC(CC(C)OO)O[O](104) <=> oxygen(1) + CCCCC[O](127) + CC([O])CC(C)OO(129) origin: Peroxyl_Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): 3.52 4.27 4.71 5.01 5.39 5.61 5.91 6.06
k(T): 7.79 7.46 7.21 7.00 6.67 6.41 5.94 5.60

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(3.2e+12,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(4.096,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing_Ext-5R-R""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(3.18266e+20,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=-2.694, Ea=(0.053,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing Ea raised from 0.0 to 0.2 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing_Ext-5R-R
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing
Ea raised from 0.0 to 0.2 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Details Observables Test Case: liquid_oxidation Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

liquid_oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test nitrogen:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:11
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:44
Reference: Memory used: 2189.50 MB
Current: Memory used: 2216.38 MB

nitrogen Failed Core Comparison ❌

Original model has 41 species.
Test model has 41 species. ✅
Original model has 360 reactions.
Test model has 359 reactions. ❌
The original model has 1 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: HNO(48) + HCO(13) <=> NO(38) + CH2O(18) origin: H_Abstraction

nitrogen Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 132 species.
Test model has 132 species. ✅
Original model has 997 reactions.
Test model has 995 reactions. ❌
The original model has 2 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: HNO(48) + HCO(13) <=> NO(38) + CH2O(18) origin: H_Abstraction
rxn: HON(T)(83) + HCO(13) <=> NO(38) + CH2O(18) origin: Disproportionation

Details Observables Test Case: NC Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.200 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

nitrogen Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test oxidation:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:03:34
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:48
Reference: Memory used: 2051.39 MB
Current: Memory used: 2081.78 MB

oxidation Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 59 species.
Test model has 59 species. ✅
Original model has 694 reactions.
Test model has 694 reactions. ✅

oxidation Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 230 species.
Test model has 230 species. ✅
Original model has 1526 reactions.
Test model has 1526 reactions. ✅

Details Observables Test Case: Oxidation Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.500 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test sulfur:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:20
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:07
Reference: Memory used: 2161.99 MB
Current: Memory used: 2178.87 MB

sulfur Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 27 species.
Test model has 27 species. ✅
Original model has 74 reactions.
Test model has 74 reactions. ✅

sulfur Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 89 species.
Test model has 89 species. ✅
Original model has 227 reactions.
Test model has 227 reactions. ✅
The original model has 1 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: O(4) + SO2(15) (+N2) <=> SO3(16) (+N2) origin: primarySulfurLibrary
The tested model has 1 reactions that the original model does not have. ❌
rxn: O(4) + SO2(15) (+N2) <=> SO3(16) (+N2) origin: primarySulfurLibrary

Details Observables Test Case: SO2 Comparison

The following observables did not match:

❌ Observable species O=S=O varied by more than 0.100 on average between old model SO2(15) and new model SO2(15) in condition 1.

⚠️ The following reaction conditions had some discrepancies:
Condition 1:
Reactor Type: IdealGasReactor
Reaction Time: 0.01 s
T0: 900 K
P0: 30 bar
Initial Mole Fractions: {'S': 0.000756, '[O][O]': 0.00129, 'N#N': 0.997954}

sulfur Failed Observable Testing ❌

Regression test superminimal:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:52
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:43
Reference: Memory used: 2323.75 MB
Current: Memory used: 2320.46 MB

superminimal Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 13 species.
Test model has 13 species. ✅
Original model has 21 reactions.
Test model has 21 reactions. ✅

superminimal Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 18 species.
Test model has 18 species. ✅
Original model has 28 reactions.
Test model has 28 reactions. ✅

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: O2(2) + [O]O(4) => [O]OO[O](17) + [H](3) origin: PDepNetwork #5
tested:
rxn: O2(2) + [O]O(4) => [O]OO[O](17) + [H](3) origin: PDepNetwork #5

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -82.04 -60.38 -47.27 -38.46 -27.30 -20.50 -11.24 -6.53
k(T): -83.19 -61.32 -48.07 -39.17 -27.88 -20.98 -11.59 -6.79

kinetics: Chebyshev(coeffs=[[-38.7,-3.696e-05,-2.573e-05,-1.429e-05],[37.66,-3.807e-05,-2.65e-05,-1.471e-05],[0.396,-1.752e-05,-1.219e-05,-6.77e-06],[0.09623,-7.467e-06,-5.197e-06,-2.885e-06],[0.01887,-2.976e-06,-2.072e-06,-1.15e-06],[-0.003474,-1.187e-06,-8.261e-07,-4.586e-07]], kunits='cm^3/(mol*s)', Tmin=(300,'K'), Tmax=(2000,'K'), Pmin=(0.01,'atm'), Pmax=(98.692,'atm'))
kinetics: Chebyshev(coeffs=[[-39.45,-4.002e-05,-2.786e-05,-1.547e-05],[38.1,-4.003e-05,-2.787e-05,-1.547e-05],[0.4317,-1.799e-05,-1.252e-05,-6.95e-06],[0.1078,-7.549e-06,-5.254e-06,-2.917e-06],[0.02697,-3.017e-06,-2.1e-06,-1.166e-06],[-0.006763,-1.18e-06,-8.21e-07,-4.557e-07]], kunits='cm^3/(mol*s)', Tmin=(300,'K'), Tmax=(2000,'K'), Pmin=(0.01,'atm'), Pmax=(98.692,'atm'))
Identical kinetics comments:
kinetics:

Regression test RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:03:34
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:03:17
Reference: Memory used: 2726.17 MB
Current: Memory used: 2738.99 MB

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 13 species.
Test model has 13 species. ✅
Original model has 19 reactions.
Test model has 19 reactions. ✅

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 13 species.
Test model has 13 species. ✅
Original model has 19 reactions.
Test model has 19 reactions. ✅

Details Observables Test Case: RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:09:42
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:08:04
Reference: Memory used: 2698.77 MB
Current: Memory used: 2724.58 MB

RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 37 species.
Test model has 37 species. ✅
Original model has 232 reactions.
Test model has 232 reactions. ✅

RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 206 species.
Test model has 206 species. ✅
Original model has 1508 reactions.
Test model has 1508 reactions. ✅
The original model has 1 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: CCCO[O](34) <=> [OH](21) + CCC=O(50) origin: intra_H_migration
The tested model has 1 reactions that the original model does not have. ❌
rxn: CCCO[O](36) <=> CC[CH]OO(51) origin: intra_H_migration

Details Observables Test Case: RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅

beep boop this comment was written by a bot 🤖

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 29, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #2510 (d4ccc8a) into main (65dfeca) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head d4ccc8a differs from pull request most recent head 7e382a4. Consider uploading reports for the commit 7e382a4 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2510   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   48.54%   48.54%           
=======================================
  Files         110      110           
  Lines       30812    30812           
  Branches     8054     8054           
=======================================
  Hits        14959    14959           
- Misses      14329    14330    +1     
+ Partials     1524     1523    -1

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@rwest rwest self-requested a review July 31, 2023 13:56
rwest
rwest requested changes Jul 31, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@rwest rwest left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you only do it in the mac-os job, not the linux? Is that why this still failed?: https://github.com/JacksonBurns/RMG-Py/actions/runs/5697239853/job/15443625949

@JacksonBurns
Copy link
Contributor Author

JacksonBurns commented Jul 31, 2023

Did you only do it in the mac-os job, not the linux? Is that why this still failed?: https://github.com/JacksonBurns/RMG-Py/actions/runs/5697239853/job/15443625949

Yup, thanks for catching that. daecd87 should fix it, but let's have it run for a bit since my brain is apparently full of gravel lately

@rwest
Copy link
Member

rwest commented Jul 31, 2023

Another thing to consider: what will happen when people push to their own fork of RMG-database?

(🎶 "Nobody said it was easy..." )

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 31, 2023

Regression Testing Results

⚠️ One or more regression tests failed.
Please download the failed results and run the tests locally or check the log to see why.

Detailed regression test results.

Regression test aromatics:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:47
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:21
Reference: Memory used: 2085.00 MB
Current: Memory used: 2085.94 MB

aromatics Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 15 species.
Test model has 15 species. ✅
Original model has 11 reactions.
Test model has 11 reactions. ✅

aromatics Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 106 species.
Test model has 106 species. ✅
Original model has 358 reactions.
Test model has 358 reactions. ✅

Details Observables Test Case: Aromatics Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.500 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

aromatics Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test liquid_oxidation:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:03:41
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:44
Reference: Memory used: 2191.95 MB
Current: Memory used: 2236.17 MB

liquid_oxidation Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 37 species.
Test model has 37 species. ✅
Original model has 215 reactions.
Test model has 215 reactions. ✅

liquid_oxidation Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 202 species.
Test model has 202 species. ✅
Original model has 1618 reactions.
Test model has 1613 reactions. ❌
The original model has 5 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: [CH2]CCOO(77) + CCCCCOO(105) <=> CCCOO(35) + CC[CH]CCOO(114) origin: H_Abstraction
rxn: [CH2]CCOO(77) + CCCCCOO(105) <=> CCCOO(35) + CCC[CH]COO(113) origin: H_Abstraction
rxn: [CH2]CCOO(77) + CCCCCOO(105) <=> CCCOO(35) + C[CH]CCCOO(115) origin: H_Abstraction
rxn: [CH2]CCOO(77) + CCCCCOO(105) <=> CCCOO(35) + CCCC[CH]OO(135) origin: H_Abstraction
rxn: CCCOO(35) + [CH2]CCCCOO(116) <=> [CH2]CCOO(77) + CCCCCOO(105) origin: H_Abstraction

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: CCCCCO[O](104) + CC(CC(C)OO)O[O](103) <=> oxygen(1) + CCCCC[O](128) + CC([O])CC(C)OO(127) origin: Peroxyl_Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: CCCCCO[O](104) + CC(CC(C)OO)O[O](103) <=> oxygen(1) + CCCCC[O](127) + CC([O])CC(C)OO(129) origin: Peroxyl_Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): 3.52 4.27 4.71 5.01 5.39 5.61 5.91 6.06
k(T): 7.79 7.46 7.21 7.00 6.67 6.41 5.94 5.60

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(3.2e+12,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(4.096,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing_Ext-5R-R""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(3.18266e+20,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=-2.694, Ea=(0.053,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing Ea raised from 0.0 to 0.2 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing_Ext-5R-R
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing
Ea raised from 0.0 to 0.2 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Details Observables Test Case: liquid_oxidation Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

liquid_oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test nitrogen:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:20
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:41
Reference: Memory used: 2205.09 MB
Current: Memory used: 2210.93 MB

nitrogen Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 41 species.
Test model has 41 species. ✅
Original model has 360 reactions.
Test model has 360 reactions. ✅

nitrogen Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 132 species.
Test model has 132 species. ✅
Original model has 997 reactions.
Test model has 997 reactions. ✅

Non-identical thermo! ❌
original: O1[C]=N1
tested: O1[C]=N1

Hf(300K) S(300K) Cp(300K) Cp(400K) Cp(500K) Cp(600K) Cp(800K) Cp(1000K) Cp(1500K)
141.64 58.66 12.26 12.27 12.09 11.96 12.26 12.72 12.15
116.46 53.90 11.62 12.71 13.49 13.96 14.14 13.85 13.58

thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(O2s-CdN3d) + group(N3d-OCd) + group(Cd-HN3dO) + ring(oxirene) + radical(CdJ-NdO)
thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(O2s-CdN3d) + group(N3d-OCd) + group(Cd-HN3dO) + ring(Cyclopropene) + radical(CdJ-NdO)

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: NCO(66) <=> O1[C]=N1(126) origin: Intra_R_Add_Endocyclic
tested:
rxn: NCO(66) <=> O1[C]=N1(126) origin: Intra_R_Add_Endocyclic

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -66.25 -46.19 -34.19 -26.21 -16.28 -10.36 -2.54 1.31
k(T): -49.54 -33.65 -24.16 -17.85 -10.01 -5.35 0.80 3.82

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(6.95187e+18,'s^-1'), n=-1.628, Ea=(111.271,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Backbone0_N-2R!H-inRing_N-1R!H-inRing_Sp-2R!H-1R!H""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(6.95187e+18,'s^-1'), n=-1.628, Ea=(88.327,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Backbone0_N-2R!H-inRing_N-1R!H-inRing_Sp-2R!H-1R!H""")
Identical kinetics comments:
kinetics: Estimated from node Backbone0_N-2R!H-inRing_N-1R!H-inRing_Sp-2R!H-1R!H

Details Observables Test Case: NC Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.200 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

nitrogen Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test oxidation:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:03:47
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:47
Reference: Memory used: 2072.38 MB
Current: Memory used: 2089.84 MB

oxidation Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 59 species.
Test model has 59 species. ✅
Original model has 694 reactions.
Test model has 694 reactions. ✅

oxidation Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 230 species.
Test model has 230 species. ✅
Original model has 1526 reactions.
Test model has 1526 reactions. ✅

Details Observables Test Case: Oxidation Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.500 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test sulfur:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:31
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:07
Reference: Memory used: 2180.78 MB
Current: Memory used: 2164.40 MB

sulfur Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 27 species.
Test model has 27 species. ✅
Original model has 74 reactions.
Test model has 74 reactions. ✅

sulfur Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 89 species.
Test model has 89 species. ✅
Original model has 227 reactions.
Test model has 227 reactions. ✅
The original model has 1 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: O(4) + SO2(15) (+N2) <=> SO3(16) (+N2) origin: primarySulfurLibrary
The tested model has 1 reactions that the original model does not have. ❌
rxn: O(4) + SO2(15) (+N2) <=> SO3(16) (+N2) origin: primarySulfurLibrary

Details Observables Test Case: SO2 Comparison

The following observables did not match:

❌ Observable species O=S=O varied by more than 0.100 on average between old model SO2(15) and new model SO2(15) in condition 1.

⚠️ The following reaction conditions had some discrepancies:
Condition 1:
Reactor Type: IdealGasReactor
Reaction Time: 0.01 s
T0: 900 K
P0: 30 bar
Initial Mole Fractions: {'S': 0.000756, '[O][O]': 0.00129, 'N#N': 0.997954}

sulfur Failed Observable Testing ❌

Regression test superminimal:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:59
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:42
Reference: Memory used: 2295.14 MB
Current: Memory used: 2307.81 MB

superminimal Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 13 species.
Test model has 13 species. ✅
Original model has 21 reactions.
Test model has 21 reactions. ✅

superminimal Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 18 species.
Test model has 18 species. ✅
Original model has 28 reactions.
Test model has 28 reactions. ✅

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: O2(2) + [O]O(4) => [O]OO[O](17) + [H](3) origin: PDepNetwork #5
tested:
rxn: O2(2) + [O]O(4) => [O]OO[O](17) + [H](3) origin: PDepNetwork #5

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -82.04 -60.38 -47.27 -38.46 -27.30 -20.50 -11.24 -6.53
k(T): -83.19 -61.32 -48.07 -39.17 -27.88 -20.98 -11.59 -6.79

kinetics: Chebyshev(coeffs=[[-38.7,-3.696e-05,-2.573e-05,-1.429e-05],[37.66,-3.807e-05,-2.65e-05,-1.471e-05],[0.396,-1.752e-05,-1.219e-05,-6.77e-06],[0.09623,-7.467e-06,-5.197e-06,-2.885e-06],[0.01887,-2.976e-06,-2.072e-06,-1.15e-06],[-0.003474,-1.187e-06,-8.261e-07,-4.586e-07]], kunits='cm^3/(mol*s)', Tmin=(300,'K'), Tmax=(2000,'K'), Pmin=(0.01,'atm'), Pmax=(98.692,'atm'))
kinetics: Chebyshev(coeffs=[[-39.45,-4.002e-05,-2.786e-05,-1.547e-05],[38.1,-4.003e-05,-2.787e-05,-1.547e-05],[0.4317,-1.799e-05,-1.252e-05,-6.95e-06],[0.1078,-7.549e-06,-5.254e-06,-2.917e-06],[0.02697,-3.017e-06,-2.1e-06,-1.166e-06],[-0.006763,-1.18e-06,-8.21e-07,-4.557e-07]], kunits='cm^3/(mol*s)', Tmin=(300,'K'), Tmax=(2000,'K'), Pmin=(0.01,'atm'), Pmax=(98.692,'atm'))
Identical kinetics comments:
kinetics:

Regression test RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:04:14
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:03:17
Reference: Memory used: 2713.54 MB
Current: Memory used: 2730.94 MB

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 13 species.
Test model has 13 species. ✅
Original model has 19 reactions.
Test model has 19 reactions. ✅

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 13 species.
Test model has 13 species. ✅
Original model has 19 reactions.
Test model has 19 reactions. ✅

Details Observables Test Case: RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:10:18
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:08:01
Reference: Memory used: 2720.19 MB
Current: Memory used: 2734.15 MB

RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Failed Core Comparison ❌

Original model has 37 species.
Test model has 37 species. ✅
Original model has 232 reactions.
Test model has 233 reactions. ❌
The tested model has 1 reactions that the original model does not have. ❌
rxn: CCO[O](34) <=> [OH](21) + CC=O(61) origin: intra_H_migration

RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 206 species.
Test model has 206 species. ✅
Original model has 1508 reactions.
Test model has 1508 reactions. ✅
The original model has 1 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: CCO[O](36) <=> C[CH]OO(62) origin: intra_H_migration
The tested model has 1 reactions that the original model does not have. ❌
rxn: CCO[O](34) <=> [OH](21) + CC=O(61) origin: intra_H_migration

Details Observables Test Case: RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅

beep boop this comment was written by a bot 🤖

@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns marked this pull request as draft July 31, 2023 16:48
@JacksonBurns
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
acfac2c 
squash this commit
@JacksonBurns
Copy link
Contributor Author

JacksonBurns commented Jul 31, 2023

I am pushing some changes that will allow the following:

  • calling CI from a branch on RMG/RMG-Py using a branch on RMG/RMG-database
  • calling CI from a fork of RMG-Py using a branch on RMG/RMG-database
  • calling CI from a branch on RMG/RMG-database using a branch RMG/RMG-Py
  • calling CI from a fork on RMG-Database to a fork on RMG-Py
    ... I hope

@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns removed the Status: Ready for Review PR is complete and ready to be reviewed label Jul 31, 2023
@JacksonBurns
Copy link
Contributor Author

JacksonBurns commented Jul 31, 2023

This is much more work than it is worth. Closing this is in favor of just copying the test files over to RMG-database after #2504 is merged here, and eventually just shipping RMG-database with RMG-Py in the same repo.

This was referenced Jul 31, 2023
Merged
Closed
@rwest
Copy link
Member

rwest commented Jul 31, 2023

You could forget I mentioned the push to RMG-database. The first two commits of this were probably helpful?
They worked on https://github.com/rwest/RMG-Py/actions/runs/5716129639/job/15486943878 anyway.

@JacksonBurns
Copy link
Contributor Author

JacksonBurns commented Aug 1, 2023

#2512 will work on forks without the additional complications as well

rwest added a commit to rwest/RMG-Py that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2023
@rwest
Fix CI workflow to function on forked pushes.
5a12c97 
This is what we did in the (abandoned) PR ReactionMechanismGenerator#2510 and should
have been done in PR ReactionMechanismGenerator#2512.

It means that when the CI runs on pushes
to a forked repository, it checks out that
forked repository.
@rwest rwest mentioned this pull request Aug 2, 2023
Merged
rwest added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2023
@rwest
Merge PR #2515 to make workflow function on forked pushes
6790a61 
This is what we did in the (abandoned) PR #2510 and should have been done in PR #2512.
It means that when the CI runs on pushes to a forked repository, 
it checks out that forked repository, instead of the official one.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@rwest rwest rwest requested changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@JacksonBurns @rwest