Skip to content

Conversation

@saminacodes
Copy link
Member

@saminacodes saminacodes commented Dec 22, 2025

Added information about gas sponsorship and dedicated relayer features.


PR-Codex overview

This PR introduces a new section on Gas Sponsorship in the page.mdx file, providing detailed FAQs about the dedicated relayer service offered by thirdweb.

Detailed summary

  • Added Gas Sponsorship section.
  • Included FAQs about:
    • The dedicated relayer being an add-on service.
    • Expected benchmarks and throughput improvements.
    • Comparison with other relayer alternatives.
    • Management of scaling on multiple relayer instances.
    • Transactions per second capacity of dedicated relayers.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Expanded wallets FAQ with a new "Gas Sponsorship" section containing Q&A on dedicated relayer plan/pricing, single‑ vs multi‑executor throughput benchmarks, comparisons with alternative approaches, scaling guidance for multiple relayer instances, and transaction‑per‑second expectations. Reordered content so Gas Sponsorship appears before Security & Recoverability; Ecosystem Wallets content retained.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@saminacodes saminacodes requested review from a team as code owners December 22, 2025 21:18
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 22, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 8bdc0c0

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 22, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 Ready Ready Preview, Comment Dec 23, 2025 7:02pm
4 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
nebula Skipped Skipped Dec 23, 2025 7:02pm
thirdweb_playground Skipped Skipped Dec 23, 2025 7:02pm
thirdweb-www Skipped Skipped Dec 23, 2025 7:02pm
wallet-ui Skipped Skipped Dec 23, 2025 7:02pm

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Portal Involves changes to the Portal (docs) codebase. label Dec 22, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 22, 2025

Walkthrough

Removed the "Server Wallets" heading and added a new "Gas Sponsorship" section with multiple Details blocks (relayer plan/pricing, benchmarks, comparisons, scaling, TPS). Ecosystem Wallets remains; Gas Sponsorship placed before Security & Recoverability. No public API changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
FAQ Documentation
apps/portal/src/app/wallets/faq/page.mdx
Removed the "Server Wallets" heading and inserted a new "Gas Sponsorship" section comprising multiple Details blocks: dedicated relayer plan/add‑on with pricing link, single vs. multi‑executor benchmark notes, comparisons to alternatives (self‑hosted queue, EIP‑2771, analytics), multi‑instance scaling and funding considerations, and approximate TPS guidance (~100 TPS with ten executors).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is incomplete, missing required sections from the template: issue tag (TEAM-0000), comprehensive Notes for the reviewer, and How to test section. Add the Linear issue tag, expand Notes for the reviewer with specific review guidance, and include testing instructions in the How to test section.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: expanding the FAQ with dedicated relayer content, which matches the raw summary showing a new Gas Sponsorship section with relayer-related FAQs.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch saminacodes-patch-1

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Errors were encountered while retrieving linked issues.

Errors (1)
  • TEAM-0000: Entity not found: Issue - Could not find referenced Issue.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 22, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 53.19%. Comparing base (9c04b3f) to head (8bdc0c0).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8585   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   53.19%   53.19%           
=======================================
  Files         922      922           
  Lines       61480    61480           
  Branches     4032     4032           
=======================================
  Hits        32706    32706           
  Misses      28676    28676           
  Partials       98       98           
Flag Coverage Δ
packages 53.19% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/portal/src/app/wallets/faq/page.mdx (1)

64-66: LGTM!

The FAQ clearly explains the dedicated relayer is an add-on service and provides a helpful link to pricing information.

Optional: Consider consistent capitalization

For consistency, you might want to use either "Dedicated Relayer" (capitalized) or "dedicated relayer" (lowercase) throughout all the FAQ entries. Currently line 65 uses "Dedicated Relayer" while other entries use "dedicated relayer".

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c04b3f and b3024ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/portal/src/app/wallets/faq/page.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (8)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Tests (pnpm, esbuild)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Tests (pnpm, webpack)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Tests (pnpm, vite)
  • GitHub Check: Lint Packages
  • GitHub Check: Unit Tests
  • GitHub Check: Build Packages
  • GitHub Check: Size
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/portal/src/app/wallets/faq/page.mdx (3)

62-63: LGTM!

The section heading is clear and follows the same format as other sections in the FAQ.


82-86: LGTM!

The FAQ clearly explains that scaling is managed and describes what aspects are handled by thirdweb (executor/chain configuration, infrastructure, and automatic funding).


88-90: LGTM!

The FAQ provides a clear answer about TPS capacity with appropriate caveats about chain-specific factors. The benchmark of ~100 TPS with ten executors is helpful for users evaluating the service.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 22, 2025

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
@thirdweb-dev/nexus (esm) 105.66 KB (0%)
@thirdweb-dev/nexus (cjs) 319.47 KB (0%)

@saminacodes saminacodes enabled auto-merge (squash) December 23, 2025 18:51
@saminacodes saminacodes added the merge-queue Adds the pull request to Graphite's merge queue. label Dec 23, 2025
Copy link
Member Author

saminacodes commented Dec 23, 2025

Merge activity

Added information about gas sponsorship and dedicated relayer features.

<!--

## title your PR with this format: "[SDK/Dashboard/Portal] Feature/Fix: Concise title for the changes"

If you did not copy the branch name from Linear, paste the issue tag here (format is TEAM-0000):

## Notes for the reviewer

Anything important to call out? Be sure to also clarify these in your comments.

## How to test

Unit tests, playground, etc.

-->

<!-- start pr-codex -->

---

## PR-Codex overview
This PR introduces new content related to `Gas Sponsorship` in the `page.mdx` file, adding FAQs about the dedicated relayer service offered by thirdweb.

### Detailed summary
- Added a new section titled `Gas Sponsorship`.
- Included multiple FAQs regarding the dedicated relayer:
  - Its status as an add-on service.
  - Expected performance benchmarks.
  - Comparison to other alternatives.
  - Management of scaling on multiple relayer instances.
  - Transaction handling capacity.

> ✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with `/codex {your question}`

<!-- end pr-codex -->

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Documentation**
  * Expanded wallets FAQ with a new "Gas Sponsorship" section covering dedicated relayer plan/pricing, throughput benchmarks for single vs. multi-executor setups, comparisons with alternative queue approaches, scaling guidance for multiple relayer instances, and transaction-per-second expectations. Reordered content so Gas Sponsorship appears before Security & Recoverability; Ecosystem Wallets content retained.

<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the saminacodes-patch-1 branch from f44fd16 to 8bdc0c0 Compare December 23, 2025 18:52
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – nebula December 23, 2025 18:52 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – thirdweb-www December 23, 2025 18:52 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – wallet-ui December 23, 2025 18:52 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – thirdweb_playground December 23, 2025 18:52 Inactive
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
apps/portal/src/app/wallets/faq/page.mdx (2)

68-72: Remove redundant phrase in line 71.

Line 71 contains a redundant repetition: "with ten executors instead of one" appears twice in the same sentence, making it awkward to read.

🔎 Proposed fix
-	The premium tier with ten executors instead of one will improve this by 10x with ten executors instead of one.
+	The premium tier with ten executors instead of one will improve this by 10x.

74-77: Fix missing article and clarify EIP reference.

Line 77 is missing an article before "EIP-2771 relayer." Additionally, line 75 references "7702" which should be clarified as "EIP-7702" for consistency with standard Ethereum Improvement Proposal nomenclature.

🔎 Proposed fixes
-	Our dedicated relayer gives you your very own queue. It is also built for 7702 - meaning both user and server wallets can use it without any code changes and msg.sender still remains as the user. 
+	Our dedicated relayer gives you your very own queue. It is also built for EIP-7702 - meaning both user and server wallets can use it without any code changes and msg.sender still remains as the user. 

-	This is in contrast with an EIP-2771 relayer which requires contract changes.
+	This is in contrast with an EIP-2771 relayer which requires contract changes.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/portal/src/app/wallets/faq/page.mdx (1)

75-75: Simplify redundant phrasing.

The phrase "still remains as" contains redundancy. Consider simplifying to either "remains" or "is still" for better readability.

🔎 Proposed fix
-	Our dedicated relayer gives you your very own queue. It is also built for 7702 - meaning both user and server wallets can use it without any code changes and msg.sender still remains as the user. 
+	Our dedicated relayer gives you your very own queue. It is also built for EIP-7702 - meaning both user and server wallets can use it without any code changes and msg.sender remains the user. 
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f44fd16 and 8bdc0c0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/portal/src/app/wallets/faq/page.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (8)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Tests (pnpm, webpack)
  • GitHub Check: Build Packages
  • GitHub Check: E2E Tests (pnpm, esbuild)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Tests (pnpm, vite)
  • GitHub Check: Unit Tests
  • GitHub Check: Lint Packages
  • GitHub Check: Size
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/portal/src/app/wallets/faq/page.mdx (3)

62-63: LGTM!

The section header follows the existing pattern and is appropriately placed in the FAQ structure.


64-66: LGTM!

Clear explanation with appropriate reference to the pricing page.


82-90: LGTM!

The scaling and TPS FAQs provide clear, practical information about the dedicated relayer service capabilities. The performance figures align with the earlier benchmark statements.

@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 8bdc0c0 into main Dec 23, 2025
25 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the saminacodes-patch-1 branch December 23, 2025 19:03
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Production – thirdweb_playground December 23, 2025 19:03 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Production – nebula December 23, 2025 19:03 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Production – thirdweb-www December 23, 2025 19:03 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Production – wallet-ui December 23, 2025 19:03 Inactive
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the merge-queue Adds the pull request to Graphite's merge queue. label Dec 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Portal Involves changes to the Portal (docs) codebase.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants