fix: update threading execution to use newTdSql instance#34570
fix: update threading execution to use newTdSql instance#34570
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @tomchon, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a potential concurrency issue in the test framework's SQL execution by ensuring that each thread operates with its own dedicated SQL connection instance. This change enhances the robustness and reliability of multi-threaded data ingestion tests, preventing conflicts and unexpected behavior that could arise from shared resources. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly addresses a potential concurrency issue in genMultiThreadSeq by creating a new tdSql instance for each thread. This prevents state sharing and potential race conditions that could occur when using a single shared instance. The fix is sound and improves the robustness of the concurrent tests. I have one suggestion to further improve the code by making it more concise.
| tlist = list() | ||
| for insert_sql in sql_list: | ||
| t = threading.Thread(target=tdSql.execute, args=(insert_sql,)) | ||
| new_sql = tdCom.newTdSql() | ||
| t = threading.Thread(target=new_sql.execute, args=(insert_sql,)) | ||
| tlist.append(t) | ||
| return tlist |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For better readability and conciseness, you can refactor this function to use a list comprehension. This is a more idiomatic Python approach for creating lists.
| tlist = list() | |
| for insert_sql in sql_list: | |
| t = threading.Thread(target=tdSql.execute, args=(insert_sql,)) | |
| new_sql = tdCom.newTdSql() | |
| t = threading.Thread(target=new_sql.execute, args=(insert_sql,)) | |
| tlist.append(t) | |
| return tlist | |
| return [threading.Thread(target=tdCom.newTdSql().execute, args=(insert_sql,)) for insert_sql in sql_list] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR updates the SQL ingestion concurrency test to avoid sharing the global tdSql instance across threads by creating a fresh TDSql client per thread via tdCom.newTdSql().
Changes:
- Import
tdComfromnew_test_framework.utilsto accessnewTdSql(). - Update
genMultiThreadSeq()to create a per-threadnewTdSqlinstance and runexecute()on that instance instead of the globaltdSql.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| # abnormal scenario: non-support datatype - n | ||
| tdSql.error("insert into test_t values(today() + 2n, 7); ", expectErrInfo=expectErrInfo, fullMatched=False) | ||
| tdSql.error( | ||
| "insert into test_t values(today() + 2n, 7); ", | ||
| expectErrInfo=expectErrInfo, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
tdCom.newTdSql() creates a new cursor/connection wrapper, but the instance is never closed. Since one newTdSql is created per thread, this can leak resources across the test run. Consider moving newTdSql() creation into the thread target and ensuring close() is called in a finally block (or otherwise retain references so you can close them after join()).
| @@ -1,27 +1,21 @@ | |||
| from new_test_framework.utils import tdLog, tdSql, AutoGen | |||
| from random import randint | |||
| from new_test_framework.utils import tdCom, tdLog, tdSql, AutoGen | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is trailing whitespace at the end of the import line; please remove it to avoid noisy diffs and potential style/lint failures.
https://project.feishu.cn/taosdata_td/defect/detail/6798991800