Skip to content

Conversation

@gforsyth
Copy link
Contributor

We are dropping Python 3.10 in RAPIDS 26.04.

I think we want the same matrix entries, just with 3.10 changed to 3.11 where appropriate.
I don't think there is any loss of coverage on oldest, latest, etc here

xref rapidsai/build-planning#246

@gforsyth gforsyth requested a review from a team as a code owner January 26, 2026 20:26
@gforsyth gforsyth requested review from bdice and removed request for a team January 26, 2026 20:26
@gforsyth gforsyth added improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change labels Jan 26, 2026
Copy link
Member

@jameslamb jameslamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I support just switching all the Python 3.10 jobs to 3.11 (holding fixed the demands we're placing on the different runner types).

We'll do a bigger rebalancing when Python 3.14 (and maybe 3.14t) are added.

Copy link
Contributor

@bdice bdice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I agree with James.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants