Skip to content

Bump rain.interpreter.interface submodule#425

Merged
findolor merged 6 commits intomainfrom
chore/bump-rain-interpreter-interface
Feb 5, 2026
Merged

Bump rain.interpreter.interface submodule#425
findolor merged 6 commits intomainfrom
chore/bump-rain-interpreter-interface

Conversation

@findolor
Copy link
Contributor

@findolor findolor commented Feb 4, 2026

Dependent PRs

Motivation

Update rain.interpreter.interface submodule to include the fix for workspace inheritance in rain.math.float, which allows the crate to be consumed as a path dependency from external repositories.

Solution

Bump lib/rain.interpreter.interface submodule to commit 3765eab.

Checks

By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:

  • made this PR as small as possible
  • unit-tested any new functionality
  • linked any relevant issues or PRs
  • included screenshots (if this involves a front-end change)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal dependencies (submodule pointers) to newer commits.
    • No changes to public APIs, behavior, or error handling.
    • No user-facing functionality or content was modified.

@findolor findolor self-assigned this Feb 4, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2026

Walkthrough

This PR updates two submodule references: lib/rain.interpreter.interface and lib/rain.metadata, advancing their tracked commit pointers without introducing functional code changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Submodule Updates
lib/rain.interpreter.interface, lib/rain.metadata
Bumped submodule commit pointers to new commit hashes; only the submodule references changed, no code or API modifications.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • hardyjosh
  • 0xgleb
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Bump rain.interpreter.interface submodule' directly and clearly describes the main change: updating a submodule reference.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/bump-rain-interpreter-interface

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@findolor findolor requested review from 0xgleb and hardyjosh February 4, 2026 08:13
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@lib/rain.metadata`:
- Line 1: The lib/rain.metadata submodule reference points to commit
153ee9042b0d5c3d94ab1e5f9ead4b0486efc902 which is not reachable from the remote;
confirm that this commit exists in the rain.metadata repository and has been
pushed, or update the submodule pointer to a valid, pushed commit. To fix,
fetch/pull the rain.metadata remote, verify the commit 153ee9... is present (or
find the intended commit), update the submodule to that reachable commit, run
the appropriate git submodule update/commit steps, and amend the
lib/rain.metadata entry in the PR so it references a pushed commit.

@@ -1 +1 @@
Subproject commit 9bbe1535b584d7b40aef493d5860153afb2b8a64
Subproject commit 153ee9042b0d5c3d94ab1e5f9ead4b0486efc902
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify submodule status and recorded commits
git submodule status --recursive
git diff --submodule=log

Repository: rainlanguage/rain.interpreter

Length of output: 390


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Show the actual diff for lib/rain.metadata file
git diff lib/rain.metadata

# Check git log for this file to see the history of changes
git log --oneline -n 10 -- lib/rain.metadata

Repository: rainlanguage/rain.interpreter

Length of output: 121


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Show the full commit details
git show 7d171a5

# Get the actual before/after state of the submodule pointer
git show 7d171a5:lib/rain.metadata
git show 7d171a5~1:lib/rain.metadata 2>/dev/null || echo "No previous version found"

Repository: rainlanguage/rain.interpreter

Length of output: 50576


The lib/rain.metadata submodule bump is intentional, but the target commit appears to be inaccessible.

The commit message "chore: bump rain.metadata to latest main" explicitly indicates this is a deliberate update. However, the submodule now points to commit 153ee9042b0d5c3d94ab1e5f9ead4b0486efc902, which cannot be fetched from the remote repository. Verify that this commit exists in the rain.metadata repository and has been pushed before merging.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@lib/rain.metadata` at line 1, The lib/rain.metadata submodule reference
points to commit 153ee9042b0d5c3d94ab1e5f9ead4b0486efc902 which is not reachable
from the remote; confirm that this commit exists in the rain.metadata repository
and has been pushed, or update the submodule pointer to a valid, pushed commit.
To fix, fetch/pull the rain.metadata remote, verify the commit 153ee9... is
present (or find the intended commit), update the submodule to that reachable
commit, run the appropriate git submodule update/commit steps, and amend the
lib/rain.metadata entry in the PR so it references a pushed commit.

@findolor findolor merged commit c11023d into main Feb 5, 2026
11 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2026

@coderabbitai assess this PR size classification for the totality of the PR with the following criterias and report it in your comment:

S/M/L PR Classification Guidelines:

This guide helps classify merged pull requests by effort and complexity rather than just line count. The goal is to assess the difficulty and scope of changes after they have been completed.

Small (S)

Characteristics:

  • Simple bug fixes, typos, or minor refactoring
  • Single-purpose changes affecting 1-2 files
  • Documentation updates
  • Configuration tweaks
  • Changes that require minimal context to review

Review Effort: Would have taken 5-10 minutes

Examples:

  • Fix typo in variable name
  • Update README with new instructions
  • Adjust configuration values
  • Simple one-line bug fixes
  • Import statement cleanup

Medium (M)

Characteristics:

  • Feature additions or enhancements
  • Refactoring that touches multiple files but maintains existing behavior
  • Breaking changes with backward compatibility
  • Changes requiring some domain knowledge to review

Review Effort: Would have taken 15-30 minutes

Examples:

  • Add new feature or component
  • Refactor common utility functions
  • Update dependencies with minor breaking changes
  • Add new component with tests
  • Performance optimizations
  • More complex bug fixes

Large (L)

Characteristics:

  • Major feature implementations
  • Breaking changes or API redesigns
  • Complex refactoring across multiple modules
  • New architectural patterns or significant design changes
  • Changes requiring deep context and multiple review rounds

Review Effort: Would have taken 45+ minutes

Examples:

  • Complete new feature with frontend/backend changes
  • Protocol upgrades or breaking changes
  • Major architectural refactoring
  • Framework or technology upgrades

Additional Factors to Consider

When deciding between sizes, also consider:

  • Test coverage impact: More comprehensive test changes lean toward larger classification
  • Risk level: Changes to critical systems bump up a size category
  • Team familiarity: Novel patterns or technologies increase complexity

Notes:

  • the assessment must be for the totality of the PR, that means comparing the base branch to the last commit of the PR
  • the assessment output must be exactly one of: S, M or L (single-line comment) in format of: SIZE={S/M/L}
  • do not include any additional text, only the size classification
  • your assessment comment must not include tips or additional sections
  • do NOT tag me or anyone else on your comment

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 5, 2026

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

SIZE=S

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants