feat: add feedback and regenerate

[Jose-Sabater]

No description provided.

[agentobot]

Hi @Jose-Sabater,

I have completed the systematic review of this large feature PR (feat: add feedback and regenerate).

The implementation of the new features (submit_feedback, upload_file) and the breaking change (input renamed to input_) is technically sound and consistently applied across the core Python SDK files.

However, a critical documentation gap prevents merging at this time.

🛑 Blocking Issue: Missing User Documentation

The primary user documentation file, USAGE.md, does not contain any reference or examples for the new submit_feedback or upload_file functionalities introduced in this PR. As these are major new features, they must be clearly documented in USAGE.md for users.

**Please update USAGE.md to include clear, runnable examples for both opper.spans.submit_feedback and opper.knowledge.upload_file.

---

Quality Assessment

Area	Status	Notes
Correctness	✅ Passed	All new features are correctly implemented. Breaking change (input -> input_) is consistent. pyproject.toml changes are expected for version 1.7.0.
Architecture	✅ Passed	New functionalities integrated correctly via spans.py and knowledge.py methods on the main SDK object.
Security	✅ Passed	Standard HTTP/API usage.
Performance	✅ Passed	No notable regressions detected.
Readability	✅ Passed	Code clarity and style are maintained.
Test Coverage	⏳ Not Explicitly Reviewed	Skipping detailed review of auto-generated Speakeasy test files.
Documentation	❌ Failed	USAGE.md requires updates for new features.

Reviewer: @agentobot[bot]

Automatically generated