Skip to content

Update OWNERS_ALIASES to include myself + "taanyas" and "marty-power"#2908

Open
mattedallo wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
mattedallo:add-core-reviewers
Open

Update OWNERS_ALIASES to include myself + "taanyas" and "marty-power"#2908
mattedallo wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
mattedallo:add-core-reviewers

Conversation

@mattedallo
Copy link
Contributor

Update OWNERS_ALIASES to include myself ("mattedallo") + "taanyas" and "marty-power" as reviewers.

  • Removed some trailing spaces.

… as reviewers, and clean up formatting.

Signed-off-by: Matteo Dallaglio <mdallagl@redhat.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 16, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


Walkthrough

The OWNERS_ALIASES file was updated to include three new aliases (marty-power, mattedallo, taanyas) in the core-reviewers section, along with minor whitespace corrections to existing entries for arkadeepsen, martinkennelly, and pperiyasamy.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Alias Configuration
OWNERS_ALIASES
Added three new aliases to core-reviewers section and corrected whitespace formatting around existing entries.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from pliurh and tssurya February 16, 2026 08:18
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/invalid-owners-file Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid OWNERS file in it. label Feb 16, 2026
core-reviewers:
- arghosh93
- arkadeepsen
- arkadeepsen
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

was there a trailing whitespace? here and for peri? seems unrelated change hence asking

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, I removed them (actually AI did once I asked to order alphabetically :D )

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented Feb 16, 2026

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 16, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 16, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 16, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mattedallo, tssurya

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented Feb 16, 2026

/hold

I'd wait till Tanya becomes an org member, else its technically incorrect to add her github user handle from security perspective
feel free to remove the hold after the org member addition happens and bot is happy here #2908 (comment)

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 16, 2026
@taanyas
Copy link

taanyas commented Feb 16, 2026

/verify-owners

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/invalid-owners-file Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid OWNERS file in it. label Feb 16, 2026
@taanyas
Copy link

taanyas commented Feb 16, 2026

/remove-hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 16, 2026
@mattedallo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@mattedallo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 18, 2026

@mattedallo: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/security 248f366 link false /test security
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 248f366 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@mattedallo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

Comments