Skip to content

Conversation

@mzecc
Copy link
Collaborator

@mzecc mzecc commented Nov 25, 2025

Description

Alternative path to achieve the same thing. All the result type are contained in a unique ResultGen object so that we now have a unique instance_array of the ResultGen type.

I am now working on the testing part.

Checklist

Please confirm that this pull request has done the following:

  • Tests added
  • Documentation added (where applicable)
  • Changelog item added to changelog/

@mzecc mzecc requested a review from znicholls November 25, 2025 13:38
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 89.70588% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 94.85%. Comparing base (ca2a5f5) to head (6b55f08).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/example_fgen_basic/result/result_gen.py 89.79% 3 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
src/example_fgen_basic/get_square_root.py 88.23% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              main      #38      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   100.00%   94.85%   -5.15%     
===========================================
  Files            7       10       +3     
  Lines           68      136      +68     
  Branches         0        9       +9     
===========================================
+ Hits            68      129      +61     
- Misses           0        4       +4     
- Partials         0        3       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants