Skip to content

[Util] read-badger to support querying consumer progress#8382

Draft
zhangchiqing wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
leo/util-query-consumer-progress
Draft

[Util] read-badger to support querying consumer progress#8382
zhangchiqing wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
leo/util-query-consumer-progress

Conversation

@zhangchiqing
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 3, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch leo/util-query-consumer-progress

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2026

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 3, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
cmd/util/cmd/read-badger/cmd/consumer_progress.go 75.00% 14 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants