fix(react-router): reject orphaned IonPage registrations during navigation #30867
+227
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue number: resolves #28878
What is the current behavior?
When a React component conditionally renders different
IonPagestructures based on state (e.g., a list view vs. an empty state view), and a state change happens simultaneously with navigation, the wrong view is displayed. The URL shows the correct destination route, but the stale/orphanedIonPagefrom the re-rendered component remains visible instead.What is the new behavior?
When an
IonPageregistration occurs for a route we're navigating away from, and the new page has a differentdata-pageidthan the existing page element, the registration is rejected. The orphaned page is hidden and scheduled for removal, ensuring the correct destination view is displayed.Does this introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Current dev build: