Conversation
| "listed": True, | ||
| "accepts_enrollment": True, | ||
| "git_source": "git://github.com/inducer/relate-sample", | ||
| "git_source": "git://github.com/dzhuang/relate-sample", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This need to be reverted when merging.
|
Thanks for doing this! I really don't understand why this works though. I tried whether dulwich does path parsing: (run in a checkout of https://github.com/inducer/pytools/, because why not) It does not. So if this code: Lines 651 to 653 in f4e8dee splits the path by |
|
OIC. I finally remembered the reason for proposing #556. The Now I can see this line ( Line 803 in f4e8dee
See something interesting in #784 |
|
FYI, >>> os.path.normpath("repo/root/sub")
'repo\\root\\sub'
>>> os.path.normpath(r"repo/root/sub\.attribute")
'repo\\root\\sub\\.attribute'
|
|
I propose that we standardize on How do you feel about this direction? |
|
I agree. But my first attempt failed (see #784). Maybe there're more |
Testing #556 as mentioned in #767. The tests works without problems. The merge of this PR requires dzhuang/relate-sample@f43b734 being merged into sample repo.
P.S., We should mention in docs that path split should always use
/.@inducer