embedded education: add first draft of the approach

open-models-guideline.md

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+## Pedagogical Scenario on Open Models for Educational Hackathon
+
+*Scenario based on the framework for [embedded education in hackathon project](https://github.com/AbcSxyZ/educational-hackathon/blob/embedded-education/resources/embedded-education.md).*
+
+### Project introduction
+
+**Introduction questions for participants:**
+- What are your expectations for this event?
+- What open models are you aware of using?
+- How did you learn about these topics?
+
+Functionning of copyright
+
+Explanation of the brick of knowledge:
+- Overview of the content
+- Show the forge
+
+Explanation on open science:
+- Debate what is science ?
+- Use of nature with paywall
+- AroDes & archive ouverte UNIGE, network of library [Build open archive network]
+- Search engine and Core [Leave some time to test some research with open science]
+
+Brief overview of open software:
+- Show a forge with a collaborative and meaningful software (Invenio RDM, participants example?)
+- Brief explanation on Linux and its ecosystem (including GAFAM)
+
+Break in fablab, introduction to open hardware:
+- explain with 3D printer and blueprint
+- Explanation of Factories (Fabrique des mobilités, fabrique des santés...)
+- Link to covid crisis, both for articles and hardware
+
+Return in workroom:
+- Explanation around open source
+
+=> **Main notions:** Open Education, Open Science, Open Software, Open Hardware, Open Source
+
+=> **Ancillary notions:**  Open Educational Resources, digital common, forge, open license
+
+Transmitted informations:
+- Understanding the idea of sharing resources in various fields
+- Understanding of ecosystem and collaboration around digital commons
+- Showing the ubiquity of open models.
+
+## Global understanding of the challenge
+
+Focus on training on open models inside organisations
+
+=> History of open source/open science, moving towards collaboration
+- Orientation of organization toward open source/science/education...
+
+Debate: utility of open models training ?  
+
+Show ecosystem, projects and tools around the brick, actors involved in open models
+
+Introduce the framework for educational hackathon and the strategy for the event
+
+Transmitted informations:
+- Immaturity of infrastructure and culture, discovering open models
+- Lack of training per open models, no training for open models as a whole
+- Open Education pedagogical strategies

resources/embedded-education.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+# Embedded education in hackathon project
+
+Pedagogical strategy to integrate a form of training related to a subject within a hackathon project, linked to the idea of project-based learning.
+
+The will is to shape a strategy to structure a learning process during a hackathon and think about the elements that will help reinforce this process.
+
+## Workflow
+
+The following workflow is designed to help assimilate concepts progressively by continuously linking them with the project, where we build the foundations to be extended. A learning process where it's going to be useful to mobilize [learning areas](hackathon-learning-area.md) in the best possible ways.
+
+It will be a combination of structured and unstructured learning.
+
+> ⚠️ Attention to cognitive engagement.
+
+1/ Project introduction (basic notions)
+- **Participants' presentation**: questions on their relation with the topic
+- **Explanation of the project**: introduce a basic set of notions integrated into this explanation
+
+2/ Seeking a global understanding of the challenge (notions complexity)
+- **Focus on the hackathon problematic**: Expanding knowledge on notions and diving into their complexity
+
+3/ Direction choice for the hackathon project (notions reflexivity)
+- **Collective debate and ideation to define the work project**: imagine through notions mobilization, questioning possibilities
+
+4/ Development of the hackathon project (notions application)
+- **Design the project and shape its strategy**: create with and apply the accumulated notions
+
+## Participants motivation
+
+The aim is to encourage participants' motivation to foster the appropriation of knowledge and involvement in the project. A variety of dimensions come into play.
+
+**The objective would be to bring them into a personal inquiry**, to make it possible to adopt an investigative posture based on a project linked to personal sensitivity.
+
+**Motivation factors:**
+- Authentic, interesting and valuable problems/topics
+- Interest in learning and understanding the subject, rather than outcomes (grade, price, etc.).
+- Possibility to work with others
+- Appropriation of the subject
+- Feeling of competence
+- Autonomy
+- Balanced cognitive engagement
+
+**Personal interest:**
+- Skills development (perceived and acquired)
+- Use of skills and knowledge
+- Professional development (network, opportunities, etc.)
+
+**Collective interest:**
+- Societal impact of the project
+- Participation in a global project
+- Contribution to common good and/or digital commons
+
+## Trainer/Mentor Role
+
+The trainer's role will be to nurture this learning process, both by providing knowledge and by contributing to the participants' reflective attitude. They should be in a learning and research posture, with a high level of cognitive activity in this complex environment.
+
+A stance that highlights possible mistakes and celebrates learning.
+
+**Activities:**
+- Share information to give learning opportunities
+- Help to examine and expand ideas
+- Feedback
+- Providing contradictory reflections and predictions
+- Encourage the use of the learning and meta-cognition process
+
+![Reflexive learning](/images/reflexive-learning.png)