[Behat] Add Textline fieldtype BDD tests#552
[Behat] Add Textline fieldtype BDD tests#552miguelcleverti wants to merge 1 commit intoezsystems:masterfrom
Conversation
bin/travis/runbehat.sh
Outdated
| cd $HOME/build/ezplatform | ||
|
|
||
| php bin/behat -vv --profile=platformui --tags='~@edge' | ||
| php bin/behat -vv --profile=platformui --tags='~@edge && ~@notWorking' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we already have a tag called @\broken, should use the same
|
+1 (however dependency in behat bundle needs to pass, and merge, and this then needs to pass, before merge here) |
| ## | ||
| @javascript @common | ||
| Scenario: A Content of an Content Type that has a text line fieldtype must have a text field | ||
| Given a Content Type with an "text line" Field exists |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Given a Content Type with a "Text Line" Field Definition exists ?
I would write our domain names with the first letter uppercased. Also, a Content Type is made of Field Definitions, not Fields
miguelcleverti
force-pushed
the
textlineBehatTests
branch
from
f6068cb to
93c9152
Compare
|
@andrerom changed the |
miguelcleverti
force-pushed
the
textlineBehatTests
branch
from
93c9152 to
52e0baf
Compare
|
@dpobel I made all the changes suggested that are specific to Text Line, I took note of the rest and will make a dedicated PR with those since they are related to FieldType Behat in general. |
| Scenario: A Content item of an Content Type that has a Text Line Field Definition must have a Text Line Field | ||
| Given a Content Type with an "text line" Field exists | ||
| When I create a content of this type | ||
| Then I should see a "text line" field |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe specify "input field" (form domain).
4 participants
PlatformUI Textline BDD tests. Feature file and behat suite added.
Six test were marker with a
brokentag, five of them depends on another Context(ContentType Context) that will be added later, since we are still improving the general organization of the Behat code.The other test marked as
brokenstill need further work however I don't think we should block this PR because of it.Also added to the
runbehat.shscript the exclusion of not working tests.depends on: ezsystems/BehatBundle#53