Skip to content

Conversation

@RolandJentschETAS
Copy link
Contributor

Currently infrastructure and integration topics are in the feature folder. But that are technical topics, which does not come into the target. So that are no target features. They belongs to the platform as technical base, but the current mixture is confusing. Therefore it is moved to more fitting folder.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2026

⚠️ Docs-as-Code version mismatch detected
Please check the CI build logs for details and align the documentation version with the Bazel dependency.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2026

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

FScholPer
FScholPer previously approved these changes Feb 5, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@masc2023 masc2023 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are these information not anyhow obsolete and can be deleted?

FScholPer
FScholPer previously approved these changes Feb 9, 2026
@RolandJentschETAS
Copy link
Contributor Author

Are these information not anyhow obsolete and can be deleted?

No, this shall be moved in far future into another repository. But not deleted.

@masc2023
Copy link
Contributor

Are these information not anyhow obsolete and can be deleted?

No, this shall be moved in far future into another repository. But not deleted.

Needs discussion, the content is in my opinion outdated, and not relevant any more

@anmittag
Copy link
Member

Maybe we have to rethink the organization of the documentation as well as the repo structure (not all in score main repos)

a) For whom is the documentation: inside developer or outside user?
b) covering/following somehow the building blocks
c) focus on release - top down?
d) following the "v-model" ?

@AlexanderLanin
Copy link
Member

Let's remove this stuff. It's not worth the discussion.

@anmittag yes... to me it feels "naturally grown". And lets address that; in parallel. It should not block this PR.

masc2023
masc2023 previously approved these changes Feb 10, 2026
@FScholPer FScholPer merged commit 6396d2e into eclipse-score:main Feb 10, 2026
6 checks passed
@AlexanderLanin
Copy link
Member

@FScholPer please use squash when merging PRs with many useless commits by the same author (which is the normal case).

Otherwise git log becomes really hard to read: https://github.com/eclipse-score/score/commits/main/?since=2026-02-10&until=2026-02-10

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants