Skip to content

Conversation

@eelcoem
Copy link
Contributor

@eelcoem eelcoem commented Feb 11, 2026

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run //:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.4.2) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: 1997d705-93b0-4486-9f0b-793279d17b00
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
DEBUG: Rule 'rust_qnx8_toolchain+' indicated that a canonical reproducible form can be obtained by modifying arguments integrity = "sha256-eQOopREOYCL5vtTb6c1cwZrql4GVrJ1FqgxarQRe1xs="
DEBUG: Repository rust_qnx8_toolchain+ instantiated at:
  <builtin>: in <toplevel>
Repository rule http_archive defined at:
  /home/runner/.bazel/external/bazel_tools/tools/build_defs/repo/http.bzl:431:31: in <toplevel>
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
WARNING: For repository 'score_bazel_platforms', the root module requires module version score_bazel_platforms@0.0.3, but got score_bazel_platforms@0.0.4 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
WARNING: For repository 'score_tooling', the root module requires module version score_tooling@1.0.5, but got score_tooling@1.1.0 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 2 packages loaded
Loading: 2 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 2 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 2 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Analyzing: target //:license-check (3 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //:license-check (3 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (41 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (47 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (87 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (89 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (89 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (144 packages loaded, 2508 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (149 packages loaded, 5427 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (153 packages loaded, 7404 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (156 packages loaded, 7414 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (156 packages loaded, 7414 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (160 packages loaded, 9545 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (161 packages loaded, 13571 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //:license-check (162 packages loaded, 13697 targets configured).
[9 / 13] JavaToolchainCompileClasses external/rules_java+/toolchains/platformclasspath_classes; 0s disk-cache, processwrapper-sandbox ... (2 actions, 1 running)
[12 / 13] [Prepa] Building license.check.license_check.jar ()
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 34.004s, Critical Path: 2.42s
INFO: 13 processes: 9 internal, 3 processwrapper-sandbox, 1 worker.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 13 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/license.check.license_check ./formatted.txt <args omitted>
usage: org.eclipse.dash.licenses.cli.Main [-batch <int>] [-cd <url>]
       [-confidence <int>] [-ef <url>] [-excludeSources <sources>] [-help] [-lic
       <url>] [-project <shortname>] [-repo <url>] [-review] [-summary <file>]
       [-timeout <seconds>] [-token <token>]

@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant