ci: run code-pushup on self in monorepo mode

[matejchalk]

Related to #888 ... sort of. I want to be able to evaluate our CI logs in a representative environment, which requires completing what @BioPhoton started in #1062.

I split our Code PushUp workflow into 2 distinct jobs:

• standalone (see logs)
  • basic "all in one" setup
  • single config file at repository root
  • no Nx task dependencies or plugin caching
  • includes all plugins
• monorepo (see logs)
  • enterprise-level "mega Nx" setup
  • heavily reliant on Nx task graph and plugin caching
  • each package has its own config
  • skips print-config commands by providing configPatterns
  • only includes plugins that make sense on project-level

Each job posts separate PR comments (I added a special jobId to @code-pushup/ci for this use case).

I refactored the code-pushup.preset.ts file to minimize duplication in code-pushup.config.ts files.

[nx-cloud]

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit a61f991

Command	Status	Duration	Result
nx code-pushup -- compare	✅ Succeeded	6s	View ↗
nx code-pushup --	✅ Succeeded	6m 39s	View ↗
nx code-pushup -- print-config --output=/home/r...	✅ Succeeded	5s	View ↗

---

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-11-28 17:43:11 UTC

[pkg-pr-new]

Open in StackBlitz

@code-pushup/ci

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/ci@1154

@code-pushup/cli

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/cli@1154

@code-pushup/core

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/core@1154

@code-pushup/create-cli

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/create-cli@1154

@code-pushup/models

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/models@1154

@code-pushup/axe-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/axe-plugin@1154

@code-pushup/nx-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/nx-plugin@1154

@code-pushup/coverage-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/coverage-plugin@1154

@code-pushup/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/eslint-plugin@1154

@code-pushup/js-packages-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/js-packages-plugin@1154

@code-pushup/jsdocs-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/jsdocs-plugin@1154

@code-pushup/lighthouse-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/lighthouse-plugin@1154

@code-pushup/typescript-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/typescript-plugin@1154

@code-pushup/utils

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/utils@1154

@code-pushup/models-transformers

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/models-transformers@1154

commit: a61f991

[github-actions]

Code PushUp

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions – compared current commit df4cd75 with previous commit d21a99c.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Categories

🏷️ Category	⭐ Previous score	⭐ Current score	🔄 Score change
Type Safety	🟢 100	🟡 56
Bug prevention	🟢 100	🟡 67
Miscellaneous	🟢 100	🟡 67
Performance	🔴 36	🔴 41
Code coverage	🟡 89	🟡 89
Documentation	🔴 35	🔴 35
Code style	🟢 100	🟢 100	–
Security	🔴 43	🔴 43	–
Updates	🟡 71	🟡 71	–
Accessibility	🟢 92	🟢 92	–
Best Practices	🟢 100	🟢 100	–
SEO	🟢 92	🟢 92	–

👍 1 group improved, 👎 4 groups regressed, 👍 5 audits improved, 👎 9 audits regressed, 16 audits changed without impacting score

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin	🗃️ Group	⭐ Previous score	⭐ Current score	🔄 Score change
TypeScript	Problems	🟢 100	🔴 0
TypeScript	Miscellaneous	🟢 100	🟡 67
Lighthouse	Performance	🔴 36	🔴 41
Code coverage	Code coverage metrics	🟡 89	🟡 89
JSDoc coverage	Documentation coverage	🔴 35	🔴 35

18 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin	🛡️ Audit	📏 Previous value	📏 Current value	🔄 Value change
TypeScript	Semantic errors	🟩 passed	🟥 2608 errors
TypeScript	No implicit any errors	🟩 passed	🟥 96 errors
TypeScript	Syntax errors	🟩 passed	🟥 5 errors
TypeScript	Declaration and language service errors	🟩 passed	🟥 2 errors
Lighthouse	Total Blocking Time	🟥 2,000 ms	🟥 1,030 ms
Lighthouse	Speed Index	🟥 6.9 s	🟥 6.2 s
Lighthouse	First Contentful Paint	🟥 3.1 s	🟥 3.3 s
Lighthouse	Time to Interactive	🟥 13.7 s	🟥 12.4 s
Code coverage	Line coverage	🟨 85.3 %	🟨 84.5 %
Code coverage	Branch coverage	🟨 87.3 %	🟨 87.1 %
JSDoc coverage	Types coverage	🟥 238 undocumented types	🟥 241 undocumented types
JSDoc coverage	Functions coverage	🟥 557 undocumented functions	🟥 561 undocumented functions
Code coverage	Function coverage	🟩 90.3 %	🟩 90.4 %
JSDoc coverage	Variables coverage	🟥 248 undocumented variables	🟥 245 undocumented variables
Lighthouse	Avoids enormous network payloads	🟩 Total size was 2,020 KiB	🟩 Total size was 2,048 KiB
Lighthouse	Minimizes main-thread work	🟥 12.6 s	🟥 8.9 s
Lighthouse	JavaScript execution time	🟥 5.9 s	🟥 3.6 s
Lighthouse	Metrics	🟩 100%	🟩 100%
Lighthouse	Uses efficient cache policy on static assets	🟨 30 resources found	🟨 30 resources found
Lighthouse	Server Backend Latencies	🟩 1,040 ms	🟩 1,240 ms
Lighthouse	Max Potential First Input Delay	🟥 1,230 ms	🟥 1,080 ms
Lighthouse	Reduce unused CSS	🟥 Potential savings of 105 KiB	🟥 Potential savings of 94 KiB
Lighthouse	Avoids an excessive DOM size	🟥 2,242 elements	🟥 2,358 elements
Lighthouse	Reduce unused JavaScript	🟥 Potential savings of 184 KiB	🟥 Potential savings of 184 KiB
Lighthouse	Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles	🟥 Potential savings of 102 KiB	🟥 Potential savings of 105 KiB
Axe Accessibility	ARIA hidden element must not be focusable or contain focusable elements	🟩 190 elements	🟩 200 elements
Axe Accessibility	IDs used in ARIA and labels must be unique	🟩 37 elements	🟩 28 elements
Lighthouse	Network Round Trip Times	🟩 50 ms	🟩 60 ms
Lighthouse	Initial server response time was short	🟩 Root document took 600 ms	🟩 Root document took 600 ms
Lighthouse	Largest Contentful Paint	🟥 11.1 s	🟥 11.1 s

648 other audits are unchanged.

[github-actions]

Code PushUp

😐 Code PushUp report is unchanged – compared current commit df4cd75 with previous commit df4cd75.

---

All of 14 projects are unchanged.

[BioPhoton]

Nice dogfooding! I had a question for custom target names.

[BioPhoton]

LGTM