-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
fix(azure): use primary NIC when iface is None in ephemeral DHCP setup #6556
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Thanks for the contribution. Please link this to the bug that this is supposed to fix. If none exists, one should be created containing full context (logs where this happened with any other relevant details).
Which conditions? Were those conditions reproducable and was this demonstrated to fix the problem when that occurs? |
Sounds good! I will get a bug made with the relevant context. For a very short overview here, three out of four calls to the Thank you for the guidance 😁 this is my first PR to Cloud-init, so I left this as a draft while I get the required materials compiled for a proper review. |
|
@cadejacobson Thanks for filing the bug. No worries - and welcome! |
|
@holmanb I have gotten this work to its final state. Could I please have you run the pipelines one more time to verify we do not need minor changes? Thanks so much! |
469b20b to
61d1bd6
Compare
|
It looks like this is waiting for updates per the latest review, so I'll hold off on reviewing it for now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look great, a few minor and optional nitpicks. Integration test results (internal) look great. The one thing I would like to see is a test covering update_primary_nic=True where the interface does change.
cjp256
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
minor changes to test and LGTM!
cjp256
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks!
|
Hi all, when can we expect this to be merged/released? |
holmanb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this @cadejacobson. One nit, otherwise this looks good to me.
This is ready for merge on our end! I got the feedback from @holmanb addressed. |
Proposed Commit Message
Updated Output
After these changes, the output for creating a VM reads:
Merge type
Fixes #6558