Skip to content

Conversation

@tvalentyn
Copy link
Contributor

follow up for #25743

@tvalentyn
Copy link
Contributor Author

R: @shunping

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @tvalentyn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the validation rules for DoFn process methods within the Apache Beam Python SDK. It addresses a previous limitation where process methods containing both yield and a return statement (even one used for early exit without a value) were incorrectly flagged. The changes now correctly permit return statements that do not provide a value to be used alongside yield, thereby offering greater flexibility for developers in structuring their DoFn logic.

Highlights

  • Relaxed DoFn Validation: The validation logic for DoFn process methods has been updated to allow return statements without an explicit value (e.g., return for early exit) to coexist with yield statements. Previously, this combination would trigger an error.
  • New Test Case: A new test TestDoFn0 has been introduced to specifically validate the updated behavior, ensuring that DoFn implementations using both yield and valueless return statements function as expected without raising errors.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment assign set of reviewers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant