Miscellaneous cleanup #3943
Merged
Miscellaneous cleanup #3943
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
dopplershift
force-pushed
the
cleanup
branch
from
e9db8ad to
20538cb
Compare
dcamron
reviewed
Dec 23, 2025
While calling the base __init__() isn't necessary, it's better practice and doesn't hurt anything.
Simplifies things versus using GiniFile directly.
This clarifies ownership around who needs to close the file.
dopplershift
force-pushed
the
cleanup
branch
from
20538cb to
c46f4c0
Compare
dcamron
approved these changes
Dec 24, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description Of Changes
Fixes some random things I noticed while looking through items identified by GitHub's new code quality checker.
LegacyMappercallsuper().__init__(). It's not needed, but it's better behavior.get_test_data(..., as_file_obj=True)in more places where we're passing on to other libraries. It just clarifies things around who should be closing the file.