Fix example of virtual circuit switching #84
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
drbruced12
reviewed
Nov 11, 2024
Contributor
drbruced12
left a comment
drbruced12
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think you have misunderstood how the allocation of VCIs is being done in our example. The VCI values are the same in this example as in the preceding, manual one. So Switch 1 is picking the value 5, not 11, as the value it wants to receive from Host A. Hence your change is not correct.
Given the confusion I will see if I can find a way to make this clearer.
Contributor
|
Not a correct change but suggests a possible area for better explanation. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The table the example is referencing contains the value 11 as outgoing VCI, which is what switch 1 selects.