updated time evolution circuit to match hamiltonian. Re-ran.#4627
updated time evolution circuit to match hamiltonian. Re-ran.#4627christopherporter1 wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
|
Thanks for contributing to Qiskit documentation! Before your PR can be merged, it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient. Thanks! 🙌 One or more of the following people are relevant to this code: |
| "# backend = service.backend(\"ibm_torino\")" | ||
| "# backend = service.least_busy(operational=True, simulator=False)\n", | ||
| "# backend = service.backend(\"ibm_torino\")\n", | ||
| "service = QiskitRuntimeService(\n", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I know CRNs aren't sensitive the way API keys are, but is it definitely ok to include one in this code?
| "metadata": {}, | ||
| "source": [ | ||
| "Let us specify the maximum Krylov dimension we wish to use, though we will check for convergence at smaller dimensions. We also specify the number of Trotter steps to use in the time evolution. For the sake of this lesson, we will choose a small Krylov dimension of just 5. This is quite limited in the context of realistic applications, but it is sufficient for this example. We will explore methods in later lessons that allow us to scale and project our Hamiltonians onto larger subspaces." | ||
| "Let us specify the maximum Krylov dimension we wish to use, though we will check for convergence at smaller dimensions. We also specify the number of Trotter steps to use in the time evolution. For the sake of this lesson, we will choose a small Krylov dimension of just 4. This is quite limited in the context of realistic applications, but it is sufficient for this example. We will explore methods in later lessons that allow us to scale and project our Hamiltonians onto larger subspaces." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider removing the word "just".
IBM Style says the following: 'Omit "just" if the omission does not change the sentence meaning. Do not use "just" to mean "only"; use "only" instead.' (I presume this makes auto-translation easier.)
3 participants
Fixes #4589