Skip to content

Conversation

@sargunv
Copy link
Contributor

@sargunv sargunv commented Oct 20, 2025

The intention is to align better with the GeoJSON specification. An alternative would be to leave it where it is but rename it to id.

See #44 for details.

Draft mode until the project is still accepting breaking changes for a new major release.

@sargunv sargunv changed the title Improve zone_id interoperability with GeoJSON implementations Proposal: move zone_id to feature properties Oct 20, 2025
@sargunv sargunv changed the title Proposal: move zone_id to feature properties v2 proposal: move zone_id to feature properties Oct 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant