-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
feat(algorithms, binary-search): divide chocolate #126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe PR adds a new "Divide Chocolate" problem under binary search (implementation, README, tests) and updates the directory; plus a cosmetic quote change in an unrelated interval module. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)(omitted — changes are self-contained algorithm and tests without multi-component control-flow that would benefit from a sequence diagram) Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
algorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/README.md (1)
50-52: Minor naming inconsistency.The documentation refers to
canDivide(camelCase), but the actual implementation usescan_divide(snake_case). The implementation correctly follows Python naming conventions. Consider updating the documentation to match: "Use the helper functioncan_divide(sweetness, k, mid)..."
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
DIRECTORY.mdalgorithms/intervals/remove_intervals/__init__.pyalgorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/README.mdalgorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/__init__.pyalgorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/test_divide_chocolate.py
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
algorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/test_divide_chocolate.py (1)
algorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/__init__.py (2)
maximize_sweetness(4-33)maximize_sweetness_2(36-54)
algorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/__init__.py (1)
algorithms/search/trie/search_suggestions/__init__.py (1)
lower_bound(5-24)
🪛 LanguageTool
algorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/README.md
[style] ~4-~4: Consider a more expressive alternative.
Context: ... share the chocolate with k friends. To do this, you’ll make k cuts to divide the ...
(DO_ACHIEVE)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
DIRECTORY.md
123-123: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 4; Actual: 6
(MD007, ul-indent)
124-124: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 6; Actual: 8
(MD007, ul-indent)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
DIRECTORY.md (1)
123-124: LGTM!The directory entry correctly documents the new "Divide Chocolate" feature under Binary Search. The indentation is consistent with other entries in this section.
algorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/__init__.py (2)
4-33: LGTM!The binary search implementation is correct. The
+ 1in line 19's mid calculation (mid = (lower_bound + upper_bound + 1) // 2) is crucial to prevent infinite loops whenlower_boundandupper_boundare adjacent values. The inline feasibility check efficiently counts pieces without a separate helper function.
36-54: LGTM!This alternative binary search implementation is also correct and uses a different but equally valid pattern (tracking
resultseparately withwhile low <= high). Having both implementations demonstrates different approaches to the same problem, which is educational.algorithms/search/binary_search/divide_chocolate/test_divide_chocolate.py (1)
1-28: LGTM!Excellent test coverage with parameterized tests validating both implementations against the same test cases. The test cases cover important scenarios including edge cases (k=0, uniform sweetness, etc.). This ensures both
maximize_sweetnessandmaximize_sweetness_2produce consistent results.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Describe your change:
Divide chocolate algorithm problem
Checklist:
Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Tests
Style
Chores
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.