Legend possibly incorrect: N and M out of alphabetical order

[katrinabrock]

Legend/Table lists: K, L, N, M O

https://github.com/csantill/RPerformanceWBLAS/blob/master/RPerformanceBLAS.Rmd#L365-L366

Currently:

| N) Grand common divisors of 400,000 pairs (recursion)|0.502|0.500|0.579|**0.478**|
| M) Creation of a 500x500 Toeplitz matrix (loops)|0.580|0.540	|**0.086**|0.542|

Unclear if it should be this (I think more likely, simple typo but legend is currently incorrect):

| M) Grand common divisors of 400,000 pairs (recursion)|0.502|0.500|0.579|**0.478**|
| N) Creation of a 500x500 Toeplitz matrix (loops)|0.580|0.540	|**0.086**|0.542|

or this (I think less likely, assume legend is currently correct, just not in alphabetical order):

| M) Creation of a 500x500 Toeplitz matrix (loops)|0.580|0.540	|**0.086**|0.542|
| N) Grand common divisors of 400,000 pairs (recursion)|0.502|0.500|0.579|**0.478**|

The reason I think the legend is currently incorrect is that the R code is properly alphabetized, and in the original script common divisors is listed before Toeplitz matrix creation.

Would be nice to know which it is because the the one listed as N in the plot MKL is winning by far while the others are similar. Well...7yo benchmarks probably not reflective of current software and hardware anyway, but I still refer back to this page from time to time.