Skip to content

Evolve guidance regarding Breech management, notification, security risk assessment #11

@rwaitman

Description

@rwaitman

June 23rd conversation led by Ravi and Abel (with Russ, Ania, and Shelley)
http://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/breach-notification/index.html

The policies and regulations already exist. Many of the partners in PCORnet are covered entities.
Russ: but are all the actors acting as covered entities and following standard security risk assessments and other elements of policy and regulation?

Ravi: 3 main guideline areas (physical, IT, process)

Or if it's a patient network where they directly deposit the data, the same rules may not apply.

Where people are not covered entities but managing more than de-identified data, there may need to be guidance as best can be provided.

The way data exchanged for consented patients for adaptable may involve a transfer agreement different than a data agreement required for limited dataset transfers.

Breech depends on other defined terms of

  • parties involved (CC, CDRN, PPRN, CDRN site, data coordinating center, vendor for the coordinating center e.g. mytrus)
  • deidentified
  • consented patient or not
  • database maintained for trial
  • data infrastructure maintained by PPRN or CDRN or site/partner.
  • BAA needed or DSA needed

Russ:

  • a deliverable may be also diagramming how data is used and safeguarded in a manner that could be explained to students.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions